Image 1 of 1
Image 1 of 1
Image 1 of 1
Image 1 of 1
Replacing an employee costs between 50% and 200% of their annual salary. This framework gives HR teams the tools to understand attrition drivers and build recognition practices that make leaving less attractive.
Covers: understanding what drives voluntary attrition in your organization, designing recognition that is specific, timely, and equitable, the stay conversation framework, flight risk identification and proactive intervention, manager accountability for retention, and the attrition metrics that give early warning of problems.
FAQS
Q What does attrition actually cost?
Replacing an employee costs between 50% and 200% of their annual salary depending on seniority and role specialization. For a senior technical or clinical role, the total cost — recruitment fees, onboarding, ramp-up time, and productivity loss during the gap — routinely exceeds one year's salary. This makes retention one of the highest-return investments available to a growing business.
Q What is a stay conversation?
A proactive structured 1:1 between a manager and an employee, focused on understanding what makes the employee want to stay and what, if anything, could cause them to leave. Unlike an exit interview, it happens before the decision to leave has been made — when there is still time to act. The framework provides a specific question guide, facilitation advice, and guidance on what to do with the information gathered.
Q How does the framework identify employees at risk of leaving?
Through a flight risk model covering the most reliable leading indicators of voluntary departure: changes in engagement signals, life events that correlate with job searches (work anniversaries, recent promotion rejections), and external market signals. The framework includes a structured approach to having a proactive retention conversation with employees flagged as high flight risk.
Q Is non-financial recognition actually effective?
Yes — and often more so than cash. Research consistently shows that specific, timely, public acknowledgement of contribution is more valued by many employees than cash bonuses of equivalent or greater value, particularly for intrinsically motivated individuals. The framework covers recognition design: what makes recognition effective, how to ensure equity in who receives it, and how to build recognition habits at the manager level.
Replacing an employee costs between 50% and 200% of their annual salary. This framework gives HR teams the tools to understand attrition drivers and build recognition practices that make leaving less attractive.
Covers: understanding what drives voluntary attrition in your organization, designing recognition that is specific, timely, and equitable, the stay conversation framework, flight risk identification and proactive intervention, manager accountability for retention, and the attrition metrics that give early warning of problems.
FAQS
Q What does attrition actually cost?
Replacing an employee costs between 50% and 200% of their annual salary depending on seniority and role specialization. For a senior technical or clinical role, the total cost — recruitment fees, onboarding, ramp-up time, and productivity loss during the gap — routinely exceeds one year's salary. This makes retention one of the highest-return investments available to a growing business.
Q What is a stay conversation?
A proactive structured 1:1 between a manager and an employee, focused on understanding what makes the employee want to stay and what, if anything, could cause them to leave. Unlike an exit interview, it happens before the decision to leave has been made — when there is still time to act. The framework provides a specific question guide, facilitation advice, and guidance on what to do with the information gathered.
Q How does the framework identify employees at risk of leaving?
Through a flight risk model covering the most reliable leading indicators of voluntary departure: changes in engagement signals, life events that correlate with job searches (work anniversaries, recent promotion rejections), and external market signals. The framework includes a structured approach to having a proactive retention conversation with employees flagged as high flight risk.
Q Is non-financial recognition actually effective?
Yes — and often more so than cash. Research consistently shows that specific, timely, public acknowledgement of contribution is more valued by many employees than cash bonuses of equivalent or greater value, particularly for intrinsically motivated individuals. The framework covers recognition design: what makes recognition effective, how to ensure equity in who receives it, and how to build recognition habits at the manager level.
