People Strategy
People Strategy
Filters
Reactive hiring is always more expensive than planned hiring. This framework gives HR teams and senior leaders the tools to build a proactive, strategy-aligned workforce plan.
Covers: current headcount and capability audit, business-driven demand forecasting, gap analysis (headcount and skills), build vs. buy vs. borrow decision framework, the hiring plan and timeline, scenario planning, and the metrics dashboard that keeps the plan on track. Designed to connect directly to the board-level people reporting that investors expect.
FAQS
Q What is workforce planning and why does it matter for a growing business?
Workforce planning aligns the people, skills, and capabilities an organization has with what it needs to deliver its strategy. For a growing business, it is the difference between reactive hiring (always behind, always paying a premium) and planned hiring (building ahead of need). It also enables investors and boards to understand people costs in the context of revenue and business milestones — which they increasingly expect at Series A and beyond.
Q How does workforce planning connect to financial planning?
People costs are typically 60–80% of operating expenditure in a growing business. Workforce planning and financial planning are therefore inseparable. The framework includes guidance on building a headcount plan that connects directly to the P&L and enables Finance to model people costs accurately in the financial forecast.
Q What is the 'build vs buy vs borrow' framework?
For every capability gap, the framework asks: develop this capability internally (build), hire someone who already has it (buy), or access it through a contractor or partner without adding headcount (borrow)? This is the most important strategic question in workforce planning — and the one that most early-stage businesses answer by default (always hire) rather than by design.
Q How often should a workforce plan be updated?
Review the baseline quarterly and update whenever there is a significant change in business direction, funding status, or revenue trajectory. The framework includes a scenario planning tool that enables HR and Finance to model multiple headcount scenarios (base case, upside, downside) alongside different revenue assumptions.
Replacing an employee costs between 50% and 200% of their annual salary. This framework gives HR teams the tools to understand attrition drivers and build recognition practices that make leaving less attractive.
Covers: understanding what drives voluntary attrition in your organization, designing recognition that is specific, timely, and equitable, the stay conversation framework, flight risk identification and proactive intervention, manager accountability for retention, and the attrition metrics that give early warning of problems.
FAQS
Q What does attrition actually cost?
Replacing an employee costs between 50% and 200% of their annual salary depending on seniority and role specialization. For a senior technical or clinical role, the total cost — recruitment fees, onboarding, ramp-up time, and productivity loss during the gap — routinely exceeds one year's salary. This makes retention one of the highest-return investments available to a growing business.
Q What is a stay conversation?
A proactive structured 1:1 between a manager and an employee, focused on understanding what makes the employee want to stay and what, if anything, could cause them to leave. Unlike an exit interview, it happens before the decision to leave has been made — when there is still time to act. The framework provides a specific question guide, facilitation advice, and guidance on what to do with the information gathered.
Q How does the framework identify employees at risk of leaving?
Through a flight risk model covering the most reliable leading indicators of voluntary departure: changes in engagement signals, life events that correlate with job searches (work anniversaries, recent promotion rejections), and external market signals. The framework includes a structured approach to having a proactive retention conversation with employees flagged as high flight risk.
Q Is non-financial recognition actually effective?
Yes — and often more so than cash. Research consistently shows that specific, timely, public acknowledgement of contribution is more valued by many employees than cash bonuses of equivalent or greater value, particularly for intrinsically motivated individuals. The framework covers recognition design: what makes recognition effective, how to ensure equity in who receives it, and how to build recognition habits at the manager level.
Unstructured pay decisions create inequity, attrition, and legal risk. This framework gives HR teams and leadership a complete, defensible compensation system from philosophy to implementation.
Covers: defining the compensation philosophy, job architecture and level definitions, market benchmarking methodology, building salary bands (min/midpoint/max), pay equity audit process, annual review cycle, and four detailed manager conversation scripts for common pay discussions. Designed to work alongside the Pay Transparency Policy.
FAQS
Q What is a pay band and how is it constructed?
A pay band is a defined salary range for a specific level and function, with a minimum, midpoint, and maximum. The minimum is typically set at the market P25 (25th percentile), the midpoint at P50 or P75 depending on competitive positioning, and the maximum at 120–130% of the midpoint. The guide walks through this construction in detail with worked examples and recommends specific market data sources for benchmarking.
Q How does this framework connect to the Pay Transparency Policy?
The Compensation Framework builds the bands; the Pay Transparency Policy governs how and when they are communicated — in job postings, to employees who ask, and proactively at offer and review time. The two documents form a complete compensation and transparency system and are designed to work together.
Q How does the pay equity audit work?
Seven steps: define comparator groups (by level and function, not job title), collect pay data, control for legitimate explanatory factors (tenure, performance, geographic adjustment), identify unexplained gaps, investigate causes, remediate (adjust pay), and report. A gap of 5% or more within a comparator group after controlling for legitimate factors triggers a mandatory joint pay assessment under the EU Pay Transparency Directive from June 2026.
Q What market data sources does the guide recommend?
Radford (AONHEWITT) for technology and life sciences, Mercer for broad industry coverage, Glassdoor and LinkedIn Salary Insights for candidate-facing benchmarks, and Levels.fyi for specialist technology roles. The guide explains how to weight different sources and how to build a composite benchmark when a single source has limited data for a specific role.
You cannot improve what you do not measure. This template gives HR teams and leadership a structured, honest way to assess the current state of diversity, equity, and inclusion in their organization.
Covers: workforce composition data collection and analysis, representation analysis by level and function, pay equity analysis by protected characteristic, assessment of inclusive hiring and promotion practices, manager accountability framework, and a time-bound action plan with measurable commitments. Designed to connect directly to the Diversity Metrics Dashboard.
FAQS
Q What does a DEI baseline audit involve?
Collecting and analyzing workforce data to understand current composition across key dimensions — gender, age, ethnicity, disability, and level. The data is assessed for representation gaps by level and function, pay equity differences by demographic, and the fairness of hiring and promotion practices. The template provides structure for the analysis even where data is incomplete or disclosure rates are low.
Q What is the difference between diversity, equity, and inclusion?
Diversity is who is in the organization — the demographic composition. Equity is whether people have equal access to opportunity and fair treatment regardless of background. Inclusion is whether people feel they belong and can contribute fully. You can have diverse hiring without equity in progression, and diversity and equity without inclusion. The audit covers all three because improving one without the others produces incomplete results.
Q Do we need complete diversity data to run this audit?
No. The template works with the data you have. Where disclosure rates are low (as is common for ethnicity and disability), the template identifies this as a data gap and includes guidance on how to improve voluntary disclosure over time, including the communication approach that most effectively increases disclosure rates without creating pressure.
Q How does this connect to the Diversity Metrics Dashboard?
The DEI Audit & Action Plan establishes the baseline and sets the direction; the Diversity Metrics Dashboard (sold separately as an Excel file) tracks progress over time. The Dashboard covers gender composition, representation by level, and promotion equity analysis — directly measuring the outcomes the Action Plan aims to improve.
An engagement survey you cannot act on is worse than no survey at all. This toolkit gives HR teams a survey instrument that produces actionable insight alongside the analysis framework to use it.
Annual survey covers: role clarity and autonomy, manager effectiveness, team dynamics, recognition and fairness, career development, organizational direction, wellbeing, and inclusion. Pulse check covers the ten highest-signal questions. Both surveys include Likert and open-text items. Includes scoring guidance, response rate benchmarks, results communication template, and action planning framework.
FAQS
Q What is the difference between engagement and satisfaction?
Engagement measures how committed, motivated, and invested employees are in their work and organization — and specifically the conditions that drive or undermine that investment. Satisfaction simply measures whether employees are happy. The distinction matters because a satisfied employee can still be disengaged, and engagement — not satisfaction — is what predicts performance, retention, and discretionary effort.
Q What does the 30-question annual survey cover?
Eight domains: role clarity and autonomy, manager effectiveness (the single strongest predictor of engagement), team dynamics and psychological safety, recognition and fairness, career development and growth, organisational direction and communication, wellbeing and workload, and inclusion. A mix of Likert scale and open-text items produces both quantitative scores for trend tracking and qualitative insight for action planning.
Q How should results be communicated to employees?
The toolkit includes a results communication template covering participation rate, headline scores by domain, key strengths, key improvement areas, and the specific actions the organization commits to taking. Sharing results without committing to action erodes trust rather than building it. The guide recommends sharing within 30 days of survey close.
Q How does the 10-question pulse survey work?
The pulse survey is a quarterly lightweight check-in using the ten highest-signal questions from the annual survey. It takes employees five minutes, gives HR early warning of engagement trends between annual surveys, and tracks whether actions taken in response to the annual survey are having an effect.
Learning and development investment without a strategy is activity without impact. This framework gives HR teams and L&D professionals the tools to build a skills-led, measurable L&D function.
Covers: current skills inventory and gap analysis, learning needs prioritization, modality selection (formal, on-the-job, social), programme design principles, budget allocation, evaluation methodology (Kirkpatrick model), and the Individual Development Plan template with conversation guide. Designed to connect to the Training Effectiveness Dashboard.
FAQS
Q What is an Individual Development Plan (IDP) and how is it different from a development conversation?
An IDP is a written document agreed between manager and employee capturing specific time-bound development goals, the activities to achieve them, and the support the organization will provide. A development conversation is the process by which the IDP is created and reviewed. The IDP gives the conversation structure and creates accountability; without it, good intentions rarely become action.
Q How does the L&D strategy framework connect to skills gap analysis?
The framework starts with a skills inventory — what capabilities exist today — and maps it against what the business needs to deliver its strategy in the next 12–24 months. The gap defines the L&D agenda. This approach means training investment is driven by strategic need rather than what is available in the market, which substantially improves return on L&D spend.
Q What learning modalities does the framework cover?
Three: formal learning (structured courses, workshops, certifications), on-the-job learning (stretch assignments, job shadowing, secondments), and social learning (coaching, mentoring, peer learning circles). Research shows approximately 70% of real development happens on the job — the framework builds this into IDP design rather than treating formal training as the default.
Q How does this connect to the Training Effectiveness Dashboard?
The L&D Strategy & IDP Template governs how training is planned and committed to; the Training Effectiveness Dashboard (sold separately as an Excel file) measures whether it worked — tracking completion rates, pre/post assessment scores, participant ratings, and cost per participant.
Poor offboarding damages culture, creates security risks, and loses institutional knowledge. This guide gives HR and managers a structured, consistent process for managing departures well.
Covers: notice period management, knowledge transfer planning, the exit interview (with question framework and analysis guide), the administrative offboarding checklist (IT, payroll, benefits, access), equipment return and data deletion, what to communicate to the team, and the post-departure obligations on both sides. Includes a connection to the Turnover Analysis Template for tracking exit trends.
FAQS
Q Why does offboarding matter commercially?
Poor offboarding has three direct commercial costs: security risks (former employees retaining access), institutional knowledge loss (never transferred), and employer brand damage (employees who leave with a poor experience talk about it). Good offboarding is the last impression the organization makes on a person who will carry that impression for the rest of their career — and who may be a future customer, partner, or reference.
Q What does the exit interview section cover?
A 20-question framework covering what prompted the person to start looking, the key factors in their decision to leave, what they would change about the role or organization, and what would have made them stay. Includes facilitation guidance for creating the conditions where honest answers are more likely, and an analysis framework for aggregating exit data over time into actionable attrition insight.
Q Does the guide cover IT and data security on departure?
Yes. The administrative checklist covers system access revocation, device return, email redirect, data preservation, payroll reconciliation, benefits closure, and the specific legal obligations on departure in each jurisdiction — including US COBRA notification, Irish P45 equivalent, Canadian Record of Employment (ROE), and Australian payment summary obligations.
Q How does the offboarding guide connect to the Turnover Analysis Template?
The Offboarding Guide generates the exit data; the Turnover Analysis Template (sold separately as an Excel file) analyses it. Exit reason categories in the Offboarding Guide are mapped directly to the Leaver Log in the Turnover Analysis Template, enabling exit data to flow seamlessly from individual offboarding conversations into organizational attrition metrics.
No results found
No results match your search. Try removing a few filters.